Plagiarism investigation and penalties

What are the consequences of infringing the rules regarding academic integrity?

If a student is found to have deliberately plagiarised or colluded the penalties are severe and can include failure of a subject or exclusion from the University. The University provides extensive resources and educates students about academic integrity so that students are aware of what constitutes plagiarism and collusion, and the consequences of those practices.

Students working

What happens if I'm investigated for plagiarising?

Plagiarism and collusion are forms of academic misconduct. The University of Melbourne has detailed processes related to student academic misconduct that are followed when a student is suspected of having plagiarised or colluded.

The process is summarised below. Full information can be found in the University Academic Board Regulation and Student Academic Integrity Policy. Please note a variation of this process applies to allegations of research misconduct.

  1. Report misconduct

    A staff member reports the suspected academic misconduct to the dean (or HOD).

  2. Initial determination

    The HOD determines what sort of response is to be taken: Is the allegation an unintended, minor, or major breach of the policy? The student may be asked to attend a meeting with the HOD and subject coordinator to discuss the implicated assessment task. The student  must be warned that a formal allegation of academic misconduct may flow on from the meeting.

  3. Possible educative response

    If it appears during the discussion that an incidence of plagiarism or collusion was minor or unintended, an educative response may be implemented.

  4. Initiating a disciplinary process

    If it appears during the discussion that deliberate academic misconduct has occurred, the HOD must end the meeting and advise the student that the disciplinary process will be initiated. The matter is then referred to the Dean in a written report.

  5. Notifying the student or students

    If the Dean decides that an allegation of academic misconduct against a student or students is to be investigated, the Dean must establish a Student Academic Misconduct Committee (the committee) and notify the student or students of the allegation and the process.

  6. Investigate allegations (Hearing)

    The committee investigates the allegations at a hearing attended by the student. The student may have a support person at the hearing. The committee makes a decision, imposes any penalties deemed appropriate in accordance with the Academic Board Regulation and Academic Board  guidelines, and reports back to the Dean or HOD.

  7. Inform student or students of the decision

    The Dean or HOD informs the student or students of the decision, any penalties that have been applied, and the right to appeal the decision. The Dean also informs the Academic Secretary and the Academic Registrar who updates the student or students' record(s).

Flow chart: Investigation of allegations of academic misconduct

What are the possible penalties for plagiarism?

  • Issue a reprimand and caution to the student;
  • Agree with the student a course of corrective action;
  • Agree with the student on a course of counselling;
  • Prohibit or deny access to or use of University premises, University facilities and services or University activities for up to two weeks;
  • Impose conditions on the student’s attendance at University premises, participation in University activities or use of University facilities and services;
  • Require the student to resubmit, or revise and resubmit, the whole or part of the assessment, examination or research;
  • Disallow or amend a mark or grade for the whole or part of the assessment, examination or research;
  • Fail the student;
  • Recommend to the Vice-Chancellor that the student’s enrolment be suspended for any period and on such terms and conditions as the committee considers necessary or appropriate;
  • Recommend to the Vice-Chancellor that the student's enrolment be terminated; or
  • Recommend to Council the revocation of the award.

Student advocacy and procedural rights

The Academic Board Regulation and the Student Academic Integrity Policy, include provisions which are designed to protect students' procedural rights. The regulation and policy, for example, allow students to have a support person present during discipline hearings, and ensures that students are given sufficient notice of the opportunity to be heard with regard to an allegation of misconduct. It is important that you are aware of your rights under the regulation and policy.

If an allegation of involvement in academic misconduct is made against you, there are a number of available services and qualified people on campus who can assist with questions you may have about the disciplinary process or any other concerns.

Student appeal process following a decision of a Student Academic Misconduct Committee

A student may lodge an appeal with the Academic Secretary within 20 days of the receiving a written decision (outcome) from a Student Academic Misconduct Committee hearing.

Information on appeals is published by the Academic Secretary and is available here.

The Regulation does not preclude a student from exercising any right to external review.

Relevant links

The following services are provided by the University of Melbourne Student Union